Skip to main content
guest
Join
|
Help
|
Sign In
WhatMakesforaFamousArtist
Home
guest
|
Join
|
Help
|
Sign In
WhatMakesforaFamousArtist
Wiki Home
Recent Changes
Pages and Files
Members
Module Overview
Week 1-What Makes for a Good Artist
Week 1-Discussion Page
Week 2-Is it Appropriate for Artists to Study Other Artists
Week 2-Discussion Page
Week 3-What Makes for a Good Art Critique
Week 3-Discussion Page
Week 4-Project Sharing and Peer Critique
Week 4-Discussion Page
Final Project Submissions
Research Groups and Artists
Discussion Assessment
Project Assessment
Peer Review Guidelines
Technology Resources
Project Assessment
Edit
0
2
…
0
Tags
No tags
Notify
RSS
Backlinks
Source
Print
Export (PDF)
Project Assessment
Category
4
3
2
1
Points Awarded
Content--Accuracy
All content
throughout the
presentation is
accurate. There are
no factual errors.
Most of the content is accurate but there
is one piece of
information that
might be inaccurate.
.
The content is
generally accurate,
but one piece of
information is
clearly flawed or
inaccurate.
Content is typically
confusing or contains
more than one factual error.
Sequencing of Information
Information is
organized in a clear,
logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next slide
Most information is
organized in a clear, logical way. One slide or item of
information seems out of place.
Some information is
logically
sequenced. An
occasional slide or item of information
seems out of place
There is no clear plan
for the organization of information.
Research and use of sources
Uses at least 6 sources which is the minimum; Equitable use of the all of the sources
Uses 6 sources; equitable use of five to six sources
Uses 5 sources; may rely more heavily on three to four sources
Uses 4 or less sources; relies heavily on one or two sources
Use of Graphics
All graphics are
attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
A few graphics are not attractive but all
support the
theme/content of the
presentation.
All graphics are
attractive but a few do not seem to
support the
theme/content of the presentation.
Several graphics are
Unattractive AND
detract from the
content of the
presentation.
Grammar and Mechanics
Contains two or fewer grammar and/or mechanical errors
Contains three to four grammar and/or mechanical errors
Contains five to six grammar and/or mechanical errors
Contains seven or more grammar and/or mechanical errors
Originality
Presentation shows
considerable
originality and
inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a
unique and
interesting way.
Presentation shows
some originality and
inventiveness. The
content and ideas are presented in an
interesting way.
Presentation shows
an attempt at originality and
inventiveness on 1-2 slides.
Presentation is a
rehash of other
people's ideas and/or
graphics and shows very little attempt at
original thought.
Total Number of Points: out of 24
Javascript Required
You need to enable Javascript in your browser to edit pages.
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"
Home
...
Loading...
throughout the
presentation is
accurate. There are
no factual errors.
is one piece of
information that
might be inaccurate.
.
generally accurate,
but one piece of
information is
clearly flawed or
inaccurate.
confusing or contains
more than one factual error.
organized in a clear, logical way. It is easy to anticipate the type of material that might be on the next slide
organized in a clear, logical way. One slide or item of
information seems out of place.
logically
sequenced. An
occasional slide or item of information
seems out of place
attractive (size and colors) and support the theme/content of the presentation.
support the
theme/content of the
presentation.
attractive but a few do not seem to
support the
theme/content of the presentation.
Unattractive AND
detract from the
content of the
presentation.
considerable
originality and
inventiveness. The content and ideas are presented in a
unique and
interesting way.
interesting way.
an attempt at originality and
inventiveness on 1-2 slides.
rehash of other
people's ideas and/or graphics and shows very little attempt at original thought.